1994 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 45 kg more than 1994 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1994 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Mercury | Jaguar |
| Model | Cougar | XJ |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 391 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
