1994 Mini MK VI vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1994 Mini MK VI is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1994 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1994 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mini MK VI | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mini | Triumph |
Model | MK VI | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |