1994 Mini MK VI vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1994 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1994 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mini MK VI. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1994 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1994 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mini MK VI | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mini | Holden |
| Model | MK VI | Epica |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
