1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire would be higher. At 3,531 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire (215 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | FTO | Jetfire |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3531 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2850 mm |
