1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1968 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1968 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | FTO | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |
