1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
| Model | FTO | 966 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2170 mm |
