1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | FTO | Celica |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2366 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
