1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1992 Rover 216 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
| Model | FTO | 216 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
