1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | FTO | 200 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |