1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1998 Panoz AIV
To start off, 1998 Panoz AIV is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz AIV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 1998 Panoz AIV | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Panoz |
| Model | FTO | AIV |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2650 mm |
