1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo V70 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2002 Volvo V70 has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo V70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | FTO | V70 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2800 mm |
