1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Korando. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | SsangYong |
| Model | FTO | Korando |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 16.9 seconds |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
