1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | FTO | Clio |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 13 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
