1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2007 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2007 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2007 Renault Grand Scenic. (131 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Grand Scenic.
2007 Renault Grand Scenic has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Renault Grand Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2007 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | FTO | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
