1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2008 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2008 Skoda Superb is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2008 Skoda Superb. (113 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2008 Skoda Superb.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2008 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | FTO | Superb |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
