1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Citroen C5
To start off, 2010 Citroen C5 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C5 (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2010 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Citroen C5 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
| Model | FTO | C5 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
