1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | FTO | C-Max |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2788 mm |