1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2010 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Renault Logan | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | FTO | Logan |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 15 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |