1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | FTO | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4394 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
