1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
Model | FTO | Eos |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |