1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2011 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2011 Honda Odyssey is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Odyssey (248 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2011 Honda Odyssey has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda Odyssey will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2011 Honda Odyssey | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
| Model | FTO | Odyssey |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 248 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2012 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1737 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
