1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | FTO | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3881 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1826 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
