1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2012 Lexus LFA
To start off, 2012 Lexus LFA is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,800 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Lexus LFA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lexus LFA (552 HP @ 8700 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lexus LFA should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2012 Lexus LFA has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Lexus LFA will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2012 Lexus LFA | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Lexus |
| Model | FTO | LFA |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 552 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 8700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4506 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1219 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2606 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
