1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2013 Dodge AVENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge AVENGER is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge AVENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge AVENGER (279 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge AVENGER should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2013 Dodge AVENGER has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge AVENGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2013 Dodge AVENGER | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
| Model | FTO | AVENGER |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 279 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4892 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2064 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2765 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
