1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | FTO | M |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 298 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4804 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2915 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
