1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | FTO | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
