1994 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Land Rover |
Model | Lancer | LR2 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 317 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4498 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1908 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2659 mm |