1994 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Croma. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Croma weights approximately 215 kg more than 1994 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Croma (280 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mitsubishi Magna. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi Magna | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Fiat |
Model | Magna | Croma |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |