1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Space Runner | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |