1994 Nissan 270 R vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan 270 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan 270 R would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan 270 R (270 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S40. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan 270 R should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 64 kg more than 1994 Nissan 270 R.
Because 1994 Nissan 270 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan 270 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan 270 R (344 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S40. (298 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan 270 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Nissan 270 R | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | 270 R | S40 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
