1994 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan Cefiro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Nissan | Land Rover |
Model | Cefiro | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1877 mm |