1994 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Cefiro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 120 kg more than 1994 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 1994 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford C-Max has manual transmission. 2012 Ford C-Max will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Nissan Cefiro | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cefiro | C-Max |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1684 mm |