1994 Nissan Crew vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1994 Nissan Crew is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1994 Nissan Crew. (129 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1994 Nissan Crew. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Crew weights approximately 107 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Nissan Crew. (176 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Nissan Crew.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Nissan Crew | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Nissan | Triumph |
| Model | Crew | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
