1994 Nissan Crew vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Crew. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Crew would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Crew is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Crew (129 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Crew should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Crew weights approximately 188 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Nissan Crew is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan Crew. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Nissan Crew | 2010 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Crew | Note |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2600 mm |
