1994 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 882 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Zastava |
Model | Aurora | 850 K |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1737 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2010 mm |