1994 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Oldsmobile Aurora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Oldsmobile Aurora | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Aurora | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |