1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Celica |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3134 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2640 mm |
