1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2008 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 200 kg more than 2008 Toyota Sequoia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
Model | Cutlass | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3134 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3110 mm |