1994 Opel Omega vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 140 kg more than 1994 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Opel Omega. (227 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Opel Omega | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 227 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |