1994 Opel Omega vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Opel Omega (207 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 100 kg more than 1994 Opel Omega.
Because 1994 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Opel Omega | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Opel | Acura |
Model | Omega | CL |
Year Released | 1994 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |