1994 Plymouth Colt vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Plymouth Colt | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Plymouth | Rover |
Model | Colt | 75 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |