1994 Plymouth Colt vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Colt (112 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Plymouth Colt | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Colt | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |
