1994 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Colt (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (68 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 40 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Fiat |
| Model | Colt | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
