1994 Plymouth Colt vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Plymouth Colt | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Plymouth | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2789 mm |