1994 Renault 19 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1994 Renault 19 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1994 Renault 19. (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault 19 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Renault 19 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Renault | Sunbeam |
| Model | 19 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 27 L |
