1994 Renault Argos vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Argos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Argos would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Argos (90 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Argos should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1994 Renault Argos.

Because 1994 Renault Argos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Renault Argos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (110 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Argos. (104 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Argos. 1994 Renault Argos has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Argos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: