1994 Renault Clio vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover Mini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover Mini (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1994 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault Clio weights approximately 159 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover Mini (94 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm). This means 1998 Rover Mini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Renault Clio | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | Mini |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
