1994 Renault Clio vs. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,896 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Magellan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1994 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan weights approximately 494 kg more than 1994 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan has automatic transmission and 1994 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1994 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: