1994 Renault Ludo vs. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser

To start off, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Ludo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Ludo would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser (239 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1994 Renault Ludo. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Ludo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 360 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Renault Ludo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser (377 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Ludo. (107 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Ludo. 1994 Renault Ludo has automatic transmission and 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser has manual transmission. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Ludo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: