1994 Renault Ludo vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Ludo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Ludo would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1994 Renault Ludo. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Ludo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 110 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda Tribute (184 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Ludo. (107 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Ludo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Renault Ludo | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Renault | Mazda |
| Model | Ludo | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
